Connect with us

Supreme Court reserves judgment in Buhari’s suit against NASS on Electoral Act

Victorious

Published

on

Follow
NAIJA NEWS: Supreme Court reserves judgment in Buhari’s suit against NASS on Electoral Act [New Naija News] » Naijacrawl
Photo: Naijacrawl

The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its judgment in a suit instituted by President Muhammadu Buhari and the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, against the National Assembly.



The suit is seeking to void section 84(12) of the Electoral Act, 2022 on the grounds that it is in conflict with a provision in the 1999 Constitution as amended.

A seven-man full panel of the Justices of the Apex Court led by Justice Muhammad Musa Dattijo reserved judgment after hearing arguments from all the parties.

Though the National Assembly was originally cited as the sole respondent in the matter, Rivers State, through the Speaker of its House of Assembly and its Attorney-General, applied and were joined as interested parties in the matter.

The applicants, through their team of lawyers led by Mr. Emmanuel Ukala, SAN, told the court that they were opposed to the suit marked SC/CV/504/2022.

Likewise, counsel to the National Assembly, Dr. Kayode Ajulo, also sought the dismissal of the suit, accusing both President Buhari and Malami of abusing the judicial process.

The respondents argued that President Buhari, having assented to the Electoral Act, could not turn back to challenge its provisions in court.

Furthermore, they contended that only the political appointees whose rights might be infringed upon by the said provision of the Electoral Act could institute an action at the Federal High Court to challenge it.

On its part, the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, brought an application to be allowed into the case as an amicus curiae (friend of the court).

The legal body, which said it was before the court to represent Nigerian citizens, prayed to the Supreme Court to dismiss the suit in the interest of the public.

“It is our submission that there is no conflict between section 84(12) and any other section of the Electoral Act, the 1999 Constitution, as amended, or the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights.

“Your lordships should take note of the ill the said section is meant to cure." "The essence of the section is to provide a level playing field for all Nigerians, such that political appointees should not use their office to advance their personal interests," counsel for the NBA, Mr. Charles Mekunye, SAN, submitted.

After it had listened to all the sides, the apex court panel said it would communicate the judgment date to the parties.

It will be recalled that Buhari and Malami had approached the Supreme Court, insisting that section 84(12) of the Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2022, is inconsistent with the provisions of sections 42, 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192, and 196 of the constitution, as well as Article 2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights.

They are, among others, seeking “a declaration that the joint and or combined reading of Section 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192 and 196 of the Constitution, which also ignores Section 84(3) of the same Act, is an additional qualifying and/or disqualifying factor for the National Assembly, House of Assembly, Gubernatorial and Presidential elections as enshrined in the said constitution, hence unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void”.

“A declaration that having regard to the clear provision of section 1(3) of the Constitution read together with section 4 of the same Constitution, the legislative powers vested in the defendant do not permit or empower it to make any other law prescribing additional qualifying/disqualifying grounds for election to the national assembly, house of assembly, gubernatorial and presidential elections outside the express constitutional qualification and disqualification provisions as already provided in each or all of sections 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192 and 196 of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), and without amendment to any of those sections is, for the reason of inconsistency, unconstitutional and therefore null and void.

as well as, “An order nullifying the provision of Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Act, 2022, by application of the blue-pencil rule, for being unconstitutional, illegal, null and void and having been made in excess of the legislative powers of the defendant as enshrined in section 4 of the constitution (as amended).”

Click Here To Comment




Ojo Sunday Victor, A Professional Graphics Designer, and a skilled Content Writer in Entertainment, News and Sport Update.!An Undergraduate in Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH, Ogbomoso). Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Be first to comment


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Naija News

Supreme Court Uholds INEC Decision to Deregister 74 Parties

Piroll

Published

on

NAIJA NEWS: Supreme Court Uholds INEC Decision to Deregister 74 Parties [New Naija News] » Naijacrawl
Photo: Naijacrawl
The apex court in the country; the Supreme Court has today upheld the de-registration of 22 political parties carried out by the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC.It will be recalled that INEC scrapped 74 political parties in 2020 based on their performance after the 2019 general election.Delivering judgment in an appeal instituted by INEC against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Justice Ejembi Eko voided and set aside a judgment of the Court of App...
Continue Reading

Naija News

Supreme Court Upholds Akeredolu Election

Piroll

Published

on

NAIJA NEWS: Supreme Court Upholds Akeredolu Election [New Naija News] » Naijacrawl
Photo: Naijacrawl
The Ondo state Governor, Rotimi Akeredolu has emerged victorious in the Supreme Court as the court thrashed out the suit leveled against him by his opponent in the last year election.The suit of Mr. Eyitayo Jegede, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP was thrown out. The court upheld Akredolu's victory in the October 10th, 2020 Gubernatorial elections.
Continue Reading

Naija News

Supreme Court Affirms Obaseki Victory ; Fined APC

Piroll

Published

on

NAIJA NEWS: Supreme Court Affirms Obaseki Victory ; Fined APC [New Naija News] » Naijacrawl
Photo: Naijacrawl
The Apex court; Supreme Court has striked out the appeal of All Progressive Congress against governor Godwin Obaseki of People Democratic Party says appellant fails to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.Supreme Court to the Appellants: the appeal should never even have been filed in the first place.Court fines APC N1m. This is a pre-election suit.The Supreme Court will also decide a similar.It will be noted that Pastor Ize Iyamu has dragged Obaseki to court for...
Continue Reading

Latest


Download Naijacrawl App today

Fastest way to read on the go

Download the Naijacrawl App.