Bissonnette, who claims she was blindsided by the information, expressed concerns about the physical and psychological risks associated with facing a transgender opponent. She cited the need for distinct categories in sports based on biological sex, emphasizing that women should not have to navigate the challenges posed by a competitor's personal life and identity decisions.

The decision to withdraw resulted in Walmsley being declared the winner by default, as organizers were unable to find a replacement in the same weight class. Bissonnette's stance echoes sentiments shared by some athletes who argue for separate categories based on biological sex.

Bissonnette referenced a study by the University of Utah, which indicated that men can punch significantly harder than women, emphasizing the potential risks associated with competing against a transgender opponent. While studies suggest that hormone blockers may mitigate some of the biological advantages, the debate around fairness and inclusivity in sports remains ongoing.

According to Boxing Canada, the identity of a transgender fighter should not be disclosed if the transition occurred before puberty, aiming to prevent discrimination. However, in this case, Bissonnette raised questions about Walmsley's history, noting a lack of recorded fights as a woman in Canada.

The incident highlights the complexities and debates surrounding transgender inclusion in sports, with athletes like Bissonnette advocating for a thoughtful consideration of the physical differences between biological males and females. As discussions on this topic continue, the sporting community grapples with finding a balance between inclusivity and maintaining fair competition. Stay tuned for updates on how this controversy may shape future sports regulations.