Vice President Kashim Shettima has become a focal point of political and public discourse, with growing concerns about his role and influence within the current administration.

Critics argue that Shettima appears increasingly sidelined, raising questions about his relevance and decision-making authority. Observers point to signs of dissatisfaction, suggesting that the Vice President feels relegated to a largely ceremonial role.

One notable issue fueling this perception is Shettima's continued residence in the old vice presidential quarters, known as Aguda House, despite the completion of a new official residence constructed at an astounding cost of N21 billion. This decision has drawn widespread criticism, with many questioning why such an expensive facility remains unused. The controversy has sparked debates about accountability and the misuse of public funds, with some interpreting his refusal to move into the new residence as symbolic of deeper dissatisfaction within the administration.

Adding to the speculation are Shettima's frequent international trips coinciding with President Bola Tinubu's official travels. Critics have noted a pattern where the Vice President leaves Nigeria without a formal transfer of presidential powers, often embarking on trips of questionable urgency. For example, during Tinubu’s recent visit to France, Shettima traveled to Côte d'Ivoire. Similarly, when Tinubu was in the United Kingdom two months ago, Shettima left for Sweden. These actions have raised eyebrows, with some interpreting them as an effort to avoid domestic political pressures, while others see them as evidence of growing frustration over his perceived exclusion from critical governance matters.

This unfolding dynamic within the presidency has ignited debates about Shettima's standing, his role in governance, and the broader implications for Nigeria's political landscape.